←back to thread

877 points thunderbong | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.216s | source
Show context
Ecco ◴[] No.42162867[source]
Without even judging the overall design (personally I don't mind the simplicity), why on earth do they use such inconsistent fonts? 3 different font sizes (and maybe also mismatching horizontal spacings) for 5 assorted logos??? This is insane...
replies(3): >>42162889 #>>42163110 #>>42163174 #
oneeyedpigeon ◴[] No.42163110[source]
You want them to be even less distinctive? Personally, I think they should lean into that more and embrace the context: e.g. sans-serif for CSS, monospace for JS, serif for HTML.
replies(2): >>42164173 #>>42165751 #
1. latexr ◴[] No.42164173[source]
The current logos are both uninteresting and badly constructed. At least either make them consistent (less distinctive but you can appreciate them as thought out as part of a family) or wildly different (more distinctive but not as clear they’re part of a family). This middle ground is the worst of all possible options.