←back to thread

885 points thunderbong | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
Ecco ◴[] No.42162867[source]
Without even judging the overall design (personally I don't mind the simplicity), why on earth do they use such inconsistent fonts? 3 different font sizes (and maybe also mismatching horizontal spacings) for 5 assorted logos??? This is insane...
replies(3): >>42162889 #>>42163110 #>>42163174 #
usrusr ◴[] No.42163174[source]
Because they are still logos, not one list of short acronyms that just happens to be rendered in a specific way?

I really think it's fine: the web assembly gets to play with its parallels between W and A, JS gets to mirror the J's bottom-bend in its S (TS tagging along because those two really are more than just accidental neighbors), whereas CSS can indulge in summetry with its twin S by making them internally symmetric themselves. A logo that contains an acronym isn't really a logo when the characters are just picked from some font instead of tailored as part of the logo.

replies(1): >>42164163 #
1. latexr ◴[] No.42164163[source]
> Because they are still logos, not one list of short acronyms that just happens to be rendered in a specific way?

Consistency still matters. If you’re going through the trouble of making logos similar so they are understood as part of a family, don’t give up half way.