←back to thread

Show HN: I built a(nother) house optimized for LAN parties

(lanparty.house)
1117 points kentonv | 2 comments | 16 Nov 24 15:52 UTC | HN request time: 0.432s | source

I wasn't quite sure if this qualified as "Show HN" given you can't really download it and try it out. However, dang said[0]:

> If it's hardware or something that's not so easy to try out over the internet, find a different way to show how it actually works—a video, for example, or a detailed post with photos.

Hopefully I did that?

Additionally, I've put code and a detailed guide for the netboot computer management setup on GitHub:

https://github.com/kentonv/lanparty

Anyway, if this shouldn't have been Show HN, I apologize!

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22336638

Show context
Multiplayer ◴[16 Nov 24 21:02 UTC] No.42159307[source]▶
As the former proprietor of LanParty.com (which I mistakenly included in a sale to IGN) I must salute you. The absolute genius of the provided lan equipment and particularly the management thereof is an inspiration.

I think the lack of any standing offerings of variations of Quake is a glaring mistake but easily rectified. :)

It's really heartening to see lan gaming continued and offered in such a way that the amount of hassle and setup is minimized and the gaming is maximized. We spent far too much time in the 90's and 2000's dealing with driver issues, etc etc. Bravo.

replies(2): >>42160766 #>>42161972 #
zamalek ◴[17 Nov 24 04:30 UTC] No.42161972[source]▶
I remember our biggest issue being IP addresses. We had no router, or expertise, so we were at the whims of automatic addresses (254.x... as far as I recall?). Good times.
replies(5): >>42162489 #>>42162967 #>>42163272 #>>42163495 #>>42174227 #
hunter2_ ◴[17 Nov 24 07:10 UTC] No.42162489[source]▶
Windows will self-assign from 169.254/16 in the absence of a DHCP server.
replies(1): >>42163236 #
tossandthrow ◴[17 Nov 24 10:19 UTC] No.42163236[source]▶
Also 15 years ago?
replies(1): >>42163476 #
1. Symbiote ◴[17 Nov 24 11:15 UTC] No.42163476[source]▶
Yes.

The idea was specified in 2005, and there's a related question about Windows using these addresses in 2011 [1]. I haven't tried to find older evidence.

[1] https://superuser.com/questions/238625/why-is-windows-defaul...

replies(1): >>42164663 #
2. amichal ◴[17 Nov 24 15:28 UTC] No.42164663[source]▶
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3927

"Microsoft Windows 98 (and later) and Mac OS 8.5 (and later) already support this capability."

And https://www.techrepublic.com/forums/discussions/win-98-fails...