←back to thread

208 points henrijn | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jsheard ◴[] No.42160029[source]
On the topic of Bluesky stats, I just learned that blocks are effectively public via the API, so there's a hall of shame ranking the most blocked users on the site: https://vqv.app/blocks.html
replies(8): >>42160045 #>>42160065 #>>42160121 #>>42160257 #>>42160386 #>>42160619 #>>42160666 #>>42161161 #
aucisson_masque ◴[] No.42160121[source]
> a hall of shame

Usually that's the opposite that happen with these kind of people. They are going to look forward on being the at the top of the leaderboard, like a child doing stupid things only to get noticed by its parents.

replies(1): >>42160259 #
hombre_fatal ◴[] No.42160259[source]
Assuming blocks themselves are never childish. Jordan Peterson is on the list and he doesn't even use the site: https://bsky.app/profile/jordanbpeterson.bsky.social
replies(5): >>42160332 #>>42160360 #>>42160812 #>>42160901 #>>42161496 #
winwang ◴[] No.42160812[source]
There was a script I once saw for Twitter where it blocked all users within some follower/followee radius of a set group of people.

For public discourse, I wonder what the right level of agreeable "echo-chambering" is.

replies(2): >>42161523 #>>42161551 #
1. ◴[] No.42161523[source]