←back to thread

Bluesky is currently gaining more than 1M users a day

(bsky.jazco.dev)
208 points henrijn | 1 comments | 16 Nov 24 21:58 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ksenzee ◴[16 Nov 24 22:48 UTC] No.42160131[source]▶
The infrastructure has been rock-solid. I’ve never seen a service grow this fast without any noticeable outages. The architecture and execution are obviously informed by serious experience at Twitter, but it’s also clear that management is giving them everything they need to do the job right.
replies(4): >>42160170 #>>42160324 #>>42160542 #>>42163517 #
nicce ◴[16 Nov 24 23:08 UTC] No.42160324[source]▶
> The infrastructure has been rock-solid. I’ve never seen a service grow this fast without any noticeable outages. The architecture and execution are obviously informed by serious experience at Twitter, but it’s also clear that management is giving them everything they need to do the job right.

The world has changed quite bit. If you have deep pockets and you can use AWS etc., it isn't a major problem anymore. However, if they indeed run it on their own data centers, that is impressive.

replies(4): >>42160426 #>>42160457 #>>42160493 #>>42161085 #
xboxnolifes ◴[16 Nov 24 23:23 UTC] No.42160457[source]▶
I'm not so sure about this when not even 24 hours ago Netflix has streaming issues running on AWS infrastructure, and existing social media sites still have outages.
replies(2): >>42160934 #>>42181090 #
1. nicce ◴[17 Nov 24 00:41 UTC] No.42160934[source]▶
> Netflix has streaming issues running on AWS infrastructure

I think the performance of Netflix is highly dependent of ISP's data centers [1].

But yeah, there are still limits where the cloud won't help you.

If you whole infrastructure is designed to serve "historical" content instead of streaming, some bottlenecks cannot be avoided if you want to server low-latency sports stream. This came by surprise for me, but apparently betting has still significant role for the viewers.

[1]: https://openconnect.netflix.com/en/