←back to thread

210 points json_bourne_ | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
crazygringo ◴[] No.42158678[source]
> Tesla has faced criticism in the past for the design of its manual release levers, which are considered poorly designed and unintuitively placed. These emergency measures require intimate knowledge of the car, something that may not be feasible in a panic situation.

First, how is this remotely legal? Are there not safety standards to ensure adults can easily exit a vehicle on fire?

Second, regardless of regulations, what on earth were they thinking at Tesla? Cars catch on fire and need fast emergency exit. Do they not care that their passengers might die?

I am absolutely horrified by this. Those poor passengers.

replies(7): >>42158719 #>>42158793 #>>42158829 #>>42158841 #>>42158880 #>>42158969 #>>42162069 #
proee ◴[] No.42158969[source]
The tolerance on many doors is such that even with a slight amount of damage, they are "physically" unable to open. The latch mechanism can get "jammed". Per the NTSB, they recommend that all electronic locks disengage in the case of an accident. Does Tesla follow this recommendation?

It's possible the vehicle was damaged in such a way that none of the door could open because of mechanical interferences.

replies(1): >>42160693 #
1. sahmeepee ◴[] No.42160693[source]
As someone else has pointed out, a car with electronic opening won't open even an unlocked door without power, so the Tesla could be compliant without meeting the spirit of the recommendation.