←back to thread

492 points storf45 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.269s | source
Show context
dylan604 ◴[] No.42157048[source]
People just do not appreciate how many gotchas can pop up doing anything live. Sure, Netflix might have a great CDN that works great for their canned content and I could see how they might have assumed that's the hardest part.

Live has changed over the years from large satellite dishes beaming to a geosat and back down to the broadcast center($$$$$), to microwave to a more local broadcast center($$$$), to running dedicated fiber long haul back to a broadcast center($$$), to having a kit with multiple cell providers pushing a signal back to a broadcast center($$), to having a direct internet connection to a server accepting a live http stream($).

I'd be curious to know what their live plan was and what their redundant plan was.

replies(6): >>42157110 #>>42157117 #>>42157164 #>>42159101 #>>42159285 #>>42159954 #
selimnairb ◴[] No.42159954[source]
Is multicast a thing on the commercial internet? Seems like that could help.
replies(1): >>42160376 #
1. dilyevsky ◴[] No.42160376[source]
If commercial = public, then no - you can not use multicast for this. It is heavily used within some enterprise networks though like if you go to a gym with lots of TVs they are all likely on multicast