←back to thread

175 points PaulHoule | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
dijit ◴[] No.42159330[source]
I always found it really frustrating that a "zero tolerance" policy to bullying seemed to disproportionately affect people who eventually fight back.

I would guess it's a combination of "nobody sees the first hit" (since your attention is elsewhere, of course) and that bullies get quite good at testing boundaries and thus know how to avoid detection.

But, really, it's truly frustrating that as I child I was bullied relentlessly, and when I finally took my parents advice and stood my ground, I was expelled from school (due to zero tolerance). Those bullies continued to torment some other kids, of course.

This is far from an uncommon situation, over the years I've heard many more scenarios like this.

replies(19): >>42159377 #>>42159404 #>>42159417 #>>42159513 #>>42159744 #>>42159758 #>>42159765 #>>42159841 #>>42159927 #>>42159986 #>>42159997 #>>42160211 #>>42160264 #>>42161468 #>>42161637 #>>42161709 #>>42161804 #>>42162427 #>>42162701 #
1. newsclues ◴[] No.42160211[source]
A grade school tried to punish me for stopping someone from hitting me by grabbing their wrist.

I said, to punish a nonviolent intervention would only incentivize future reactions would be violent, they had to think about their policy, because as I put it, “if grabbing their wrist for self defence was going to be punished the same as me punching them in the face” I’d settle for brutal violence in the hopes to persuade others not to hit me.

Children vs principals with masters degrees in a logic debate and the kids win. Sad