←back to thread

492 points storf45 | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
dylan604 ◴[] No.42157048[source]
People just do not appreciate how many gotchas can pop up doing anything live. Sure, Netflix might have a great CDN that works great for their canned content and I could see how they might have assumed that's the hardest part.

Live has changed over the years from large satellite dishes beaming to a geosat and back down to the broadcast center($$$$$), to microwave to a more local broadcast center($$$$), to running dedicated fiber long haul back to a broadcast center($$$), to having a kit with multiple cell providers pushing a signal back to a broadcast center($$), to having a direct internet connection to a server accepting a live http stream($).

I'd be curious to know what their live plan was and what their redundant plan was.

replies(6): >>42157110 #>>42157117 #>>42157164 #>>42159101 #>>42159285 #>>42159954 #
xyst ◴[] No.42159101[source]
You are making excuses for a multibillion dollar company that has been in this game for many years. Maybe the first to market in streaming.

This isn’t NFLX’s first rodeo in live streaming. Have seen a handful of events pop up in their apps.

There is no excuse. All of the resources and talent at their disposal, and they looked absolutely amateurish. Poor optics.

I would be amazed if they are able to secure another exclusive contract like this in the future.

replies(3): >>42159207 #>>42159321 #>>42160683 #
Xenoamorphous ◴[] No.42159321[source]
Sorry for the off topic but what’s this thing that I only come across in Hacker News about referring to a company by their stock exchange name (APPL, MSFT, etc) outside of a stock context? It seems really weird to me.
replies(7): >>42159354 #>>42159565 #>>42159822 #>>42159928 #>>42159950 #>>42160352 #>>42166018 #
rashabd ◴[] No.42159354[source]
merriam-webster.com/dictionary/brevity
replies(1): >>42159413 #
Xenoamorphous ◴[] No.42159413[source]
Writing APPL instead of Apple doesn’t get you any fewer keystrokes.
replies(3): >>42159483 #>>42159689 #>>42160311 #
1. SilasX ◴[] No.42159689[source]
Ugh. Similar (huge) pet peeve about people who say "n.B." instead of "note".
replies(1): >>42161845 #
2. eviks ◴[] No.42161845[source]
But it's "note well", not just "note"
replies(1): >>42162811 #
3. SilasX ◴[] No.42162811[source]
Not sure if you’re joking, but if not: there’s no practical difference is what is being asked of the reader. Nobody predicates any decision on whether they were asked to note something vs note it well.

It’s pointless jargon.