←back to thread

355 points jchanimal | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
Bengalilol ◴[] No.42159465[source]
« Stunning evidence » … then later on: « Instead, the readings _seem_ to support a basis for MOND, which _would_ force astronomers and cosmologists to reconsider this alternative and long-controversial theory of gravity. » What’s conditional evidence? I may be missing the overall picture, but I view such writing as non precise at its best.
replies(3): >>42159496 #>>42159523 #>>42159548 #
1. yieldcrv ◴[] No.42159548[source]
There is no consensus yet, there is no repeatable metric

It is perfectly valid to say “hey look over there for further review”