←back to thread

Treating bullying as everyone's problem reduces incidence in primary schools

(phys.org)
175 points PaulHoule | 3 comments | 16 Nov 24 14:34 UTC | HN request time: 0.217s | source
Show context
BriggyDwiggs42 ◴[16 Nov 24 20:20 UTC] No.42158978[source]▶
I’ve been thinking a little about this subject lately. It seems like bullying is a thing that serves the function of exacting the repressed violent desires of the social body. Who is selected for bullying is determined not primarily by the bully, but by the social group as a whole. To me this helps explain why it’s such a ubiquitous behavior; it’s a mechanism for a social group to act outside of its norms in the enforcement of its norms. To be clear, I think it’s terrible, just interesting to think about this way.
replies(7): >>42159010 #>>42159081 #>>42159419 #>>42159609 #>>42159814 #>>42160292 #>>42162737 #
1. next_xibalba ◴[16 Nov 24 21:16 UTC] No.42159419[source]▶
Interesting. You've almost framed it in Gerardian terms:

Students all want the same thing: status, popularity, etc. Not everyone can these things though. Their scarcity is their value. The competition over this finite resource creates conflict and hostility. This pent up hostility has to be channeled to avoid chaos. A scapegoat is informally agreed upon: the oddball, the misfit, the outcast. These people are all the more obvious due to the extreme herding that happens in schools. The bully acts as the "executioner" of this "sacrifice". The boundaries of group unity are enforced, the shared complicity enforcing cohesion, and group identity and control are upheld.

I remember from my school days how much hostility was directed toward people who wouldn't or couldn't "fit in". I even internalized those feelings. "Why won't he/she just act normal?"

I'm not fully sold on Gerard, but his theories are kind of mesmerizing in their pat explanation of group dynamics.

replies(2): >>42163433 #>>42187653 #
2. gverrilla ◴[17 Nov 24 11:04 UTC] No.42163433[source]▶
> Students all want the same thing: status, popularity, etc.

fake news

3. BriggyDwiggs42 ◴[19 Nov 24 20:19 UTC] No.42187653[source]▶
I like that more than mine maybe. It’s a really elegant explanation.