←back to thread

Netflix buffering issues: Boxing fans complain about Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson

(www.sportingnews.com)
492 points storf45 | 1 comments | 16 Nov 24 03:42 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ctvo ◴[16 Nov 24 18:37 UTC] No.42158173[source]▶
It’s insane the excuses being made here for Netflix’s apparently unique circumstances.

They failed. Full stop. There is no valid technical reason they couldn’t have had a smooth experience. There are numerous people with experience building these systems they could have hired and listened to. It isn’t a novel problem.

Here are the other companies that are peers that livestream just fine, ignoring traditional broadcasters:

- Google (YouTube live), millions of concurrent viewers

- Amazon (Thursday Night Football, Twitch), millions of concurrent viewers

- Apple (MLS)

NBC live streamed the Olympics in the US for tens of millions.

replies(7): >>42158347 #>>42158375 #>>42158534 #>>42158560 #>>42158615 #>>42158624 #>>42158882 #
mfiguiere ◴[16 Nov 24 19:35 UTC] No.42158615[source]▶
The examples given here are not on the same scale. The numbers known so far:

- 120m viewers [1]

- Entire Netflix CDN Traffic grew 4x when the live stream started [2]

[1] https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/jake-paul-...

[2] https://x.com/DougMadory/status/1857634875257294866

replies(3): >>42158702 #>>42158731 #>>42159120 #
prasadjoglekar ◴[16 Nov 24 19:46 UTC] No.42158702[source]▶
Disney HotStar managed to stream ~60M livestreams for the Cricket world cup a year ago. The problem has been solved. Livestreaming sports just have a different QoS expectations than on demand.

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/how-did-hotstar-managed-5-9-cr...

replies(3): >>42158822 #>>42158991 #>>42160609 #
1. margaretdouglas ◴[16 Nov 24 20:22 UTC] No.42158991[source]▶
I wouldn't say it's a solved problem, how many other companies are pulling off those numbers? Isn't that the current record for concurrent streams? And wasn't it mostly to mobile devices?