←back to thread

317 points laserduck | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.215s | source
Show context
klabb3 ◴[] No.42157457[source]
I don’t mind LLMs in the ideation and learning phases, which aren’t reproducible anyway. But I still find it hard to believe engineers of all people are eager to put a slow, expensive, non-deterministic black box right at the core of extremely complex systems that need to be reliable, inspectable, understandable…
replies(6): >>42157615 #>>42157652 #>>42158074 #>>42162081 #>>42166294 #>>42167109 #
childintime ◴[] No.42157615[source]
You mean, like humans have been for many decades now.

Edit: I believe that LLM's are eminently useful to replace experts (of all people) 90% of the time.

replies(5): >>42157661 #>>42157674 #>>42157685 #>>42157904 #>>42158502 #
1. datameta ◴[] No.42157661[source]
Change "replace" to "supplement" and I agree. The level of non-determinism is just too great at this stage, imo.