YC is wrong about LLMs for chip design

I think this whole article is predicated on misinterpreting the ask. It wasn't for the chip to take 100x less power, it was for the algorithm the chip implements. Modern synthesis tools and optimisers extensively look for design patterns the same way software compilers do. That's why there's recommended inference patterns. I think it's not impossible to expect an LLM to expand the capture range of these patterns to maybe suboptimal HDL. As a simple example, maybe a designer got really turned around and is doing some crazy math, and the LLM can go "uh, that's just addition my guy, I'll fix that for you."

Was surprised this comment was this far down. I re-read the YC ask three times to make sure I wasn’t crazy. Dude wrote the whole article based on a misunderstanding.

Thanks... I had more points earlier but I guess people changed their mind and decided they liked it better his way idk