←back to thread

688 points crescit_eundo | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.425s | source
Show context
swiftcoder ◴[] No.42144784[source]
I feel like the article neglects one obvious possibility: that OpenAI decided that chess was a benchmark worth "winning", special-cases chess within gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct, and then neglected to add that special-case to follow-up models since it wasn't generating sustained press coverage.
replies(8): >>42145306 #>>42145352 #>>42145619 #>>42145811 #>>42145883 #>>42146777 #>>42148148 #>>42151081 #
scott_w ◴[] No.42145811[source]
I suspect the same thing. Rather than LLMs “learning to play chess,” they “learnt” to recognise a chess game and hand over instructions to a chess engine. If that’s the case, I don’t feel impressed at all.
replies(5): >>42146086 #>>42146152 #>>42146383 #>>42146415 #>>42156785 #
1. kazinator ◴[] No.42156785[source]
That's not much different from a compiler being rigged to recognize a specific benchmark program and spit out a canned optimization.
replies(1): >>42171356 #
2. Peteragain ◴[] No.42171356[source]
.. or a Volkswagen recognising an emissions test and turning off power mode...