←back to thread

492 points storf45 | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.002s | source
1. ajdude ◴[] No.42156776[source]
It wasn't even just buffering issues, the feed would just stop and never start again until I paused it and then clicked "watch live" with the remote.

It was really bad. My Dad has always been a fan of boxing so I came over to watch the whole thing with him.

He has his giant inflatable screen and a projector that we hooked up in the front lawn to watch it, But everything kept buffering. We figured it was the Wi-Fi so he packed everything up and went inside only to find the same thing happening on ethernet.

He was really looking forward to watching it on the projector and Netflix disappointed him.

replies(1): >>42158681 #
2. mmooss ◴[] No.42158681[source]
> My Dad has always been a fan of boxing

What did your Dad think about the 'boxing'?

replies(2): >>42160189 #>>42160508 #
3. manquer ◴[] No.42160189[source]
Commercial boxing has always been like WWE or MMA with a thin veneer of actual sport to it, i.e. it is just entertainment[1].

To rephrase your question then what does someone think of the entertainment on display?

I don't think it was good entertainment.

None of the hallmarks of a good show was present. i.e. It wasn't close, nor was it bloody or anything unexpected like say a KO everything went pretty much as expected. It wasn't nice watch as all,no skill or talent was on disply, all Paul had to do was use his speed to backpedal from the slow weak punches of a visibly older tyson with a bum knee and land some points occasionally to win.

--

[1] There is a deeper argument here is any spectator sports just entertainment or is truly about skill talent and competition. Boxing however including the ones promoted by traditional four major associations falls clearly on the entertainment side than say another sport like NFL to me.

4. mvandermeulen ◴[] No.42160508[source]
Was this necessary? The comment was on a tech forum about the tech issues, do we really need to reprosecute the argument that it wasn’t real boxing here too? There are plenty of other places for those so painfully inclined to do so
replies(2): >>42165304 #>>42168344 #
5. pas ◴[] No.42168344{3}[source]
I appreciated the answer by manquer. HN is tech-focused but not tech-only, right?