←back to thread

151 points zdw | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
newZWhoDis ◴[] No.42153389[source]
I don’t care how much they improve the CPUs, not upgrading before OLED
replies(2): >>42153640 #>>42153844 #
matrix87 ◴[] No.42153640[source]
is OLED unequivocally better than IPS?
replies(6): >>42153696 #>>42153698 #>>42153773 #>>42153794 #>>42155046 #>>42155945 #
bmer ◴[] No.42153794[source]
I've heard that there are screen lifetime issues?

Also, from my limited experience with a single OLED screen, it seems that most stuff was created for a certain kind of screen without as much colour fidelity, and now that stuff seems far more...obnoxiously "saturated"?...on an OLED screen.

replies(4): >>42154316 #>>42154499 #>>42155221 #>>42156556 #
1. bobmcnamara ◴[] No.42156556{3}[source]
in addition to tandem OLED...

Pixel aperture ratio has increased drastically since the early displays. This drops current density for a given amount of light output, and there's a nonlinear relationship between current density and segregation so that helps a ton.

Deuterium helps make more light per unit current, improves current density, improves lifetime.

Microlensing of your customers will accept narrower viewing angle, improves brightness and lifetime in the same way.