←back to thread

M4 MacBook Pros use a quantum dot (QD) film rather than a red KSF phosphor film

(twitter.com)
151 points zdw | 1 comments | 16 Nov 24 00:21 UTC | HN request time: 0.641s | source
Show context
newZWhoDis ◴[16 Nov 24 01:38 UTC] No.42153389[source]▶
I don’t care how much they improve the CPUs, not upgrading before OLED
replies(2): >>42153640 #>>42153844 #
matrix87 ◴[16 Nov 24 02:34 UTC] No.42153640[source]▶
is OLED unequivocally better than IPS?
replies(6): >>42153696 #>>42153698 #>>42153773 #>>42153794 #>>42155046 #>>42155945 #
bmer ◴[16 Nov 24 03:07 UTC] No.42153794[source]▶
I've heard that there are screen lifetime issues?

Also, from my limited experience with a single OLED screen, it seems that most stuff was created for a certain kind of screen without as much colour fidelity, and now that stuff seems far more...obnoxiously "saturated"?...on an OLED screen.

replies(4): >>42154316 #>>42154499 #>>42155221 #>>42156556 #
glhaynes ◴[16 Nov 24 04:41 UTC] No.42154316[source]▶
Lots of devices that come with OLED displays come with a "vibrancy" mode turned on by default that oversaturates colors until you turn it off. It does look great at a glance tho!
replies(1): >>42155968 #
1. lloeki ◴[16 Nov 24 12:00 UTC] No.42155968[source]▶
Conversely lots of contents is produced on/for less-than-stellar displays and gamma+color-profiles-be-damned overcompensate with more saturated colours at the data level because it's going to show up toned down.

When a display is actually able to put out the colours it then looks gaudily oversaturated. I've had such problems already with non-OLED "somewhat† calibrated" good quality screens as well.

† I mean I did not calibrate them, they were factory calibrated with a good enough test curve slip in the package.