←back to thread

501 points thunderbong | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.486s | source
Show context
abound ◴[] No.42154107[source]
> Nobody yet understands what starts the wood frog’s heart after being frozen and inert for the entire northern winter.

To me, that's the most fascinating part of the (already quite fascinating) story. Frog is frozen solid, there is no (to our knowledge) heartbeat or brain activity. It thaws and something happens that gets it going again.

I have trouble imagining what that mechanism could even look like. Tiny portion of brain responsible for keeping track of frozen-ness? Some chemical signaling from within the body cavity?

replies(10): >>42154230 #>>42154234 #>>42154260 #>>42154392 #>>42154971 #>>42155333 #>>42155581 #>>42155724 #>>42155919 #>>42161671 #
PittleyDunkin ◴[] No.42154392[source]
The frog is not frozen solid.
replies(1): >>42154406 #
PhasmaFelis ◴[] No.42154406[source]
Interestingly, you can freeze a rat solid in liquid nitrogen--completely solid right through--and then thaw them out in a microwave and they actually survive. Well, many of them survive. For a while. Okay, it's not good for the rats but it's still crazy that it works.
replies(1): >>42155016 #
plastic3169 ◴[] No.42155016[source]
Where can I read more about this? If this was a fact I think people would be way more excited about cryonics. Casually browsing wikipedia suggests that we are not there yet with the ability to thawn large animals or even organs.
replies(4): >>42155115 #>>42155246 #>>42155875 #>>42162931 #
1. blue_pants ◴[] No.42155246[source]
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Lovelock

"In the mid-1950s, Lovelock experimented with the cryopreservation of rodents, determining that hamsters could be frozen and revived successfully.[14] Hamsters were frozen with 60% of the water in the brain crystallised into ice with no adverse effects recorded. Other organs were shown to be susceptible to damage.[15]"

And there's a Tom Scott's interview with James Lovelock:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tdiKTSdE9Y

replies(1): >>42155657 #
2. mock-possum ◴[] No.42155657[source]
Wouldn’t it be crazy if only worked on hamsters