←back to thread

492 points storf45 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jameson ◴[] No.42154205[source]
Dumb question

Isn't live streaming at scale already solved problem by cable companies? I never seen ESPN going down during a critical event

replies(3): >>42154227 #>>42154292 #>>42154536 #
dilyevsky ◴[] No.42154292[source]
This is not the same streaming - netflix is doing that over HTTP. Totally different tech and scaling issues
replies(1): >>42154937 #
1. hmcq6 ◴[] No.42154937[source]
Yes and no. It's not the "same" but this is a solved problem. Fastly regularly delivers the Super Bowl to 10x as many viewers.

Netflix dropped the ball hard

replies(1): >>42155035 #
2. dilyevsky ◴[] No.42155035[source]
Fastly says they do 6M ccv for superbowl (i'm actually surprised they let them do the entire thing and don't mix different CDNs) and I'm not sure they do encoding and manifest serving - they might just cache/deliver chunks. Do you really think tyson vs other guy was only 600k ccv? I'd be shocked if Netflix can't handle this.