←back to thread

Maybe Bluesky has "won"

(anderegg.ca)
461 points GavinAnderegg | 1 comments | 15 Nov 24 19:56 UTC | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
mrtksn ◴[15 Nov 24 20:33 UTC] No.42150650[source]▶
A year ago, Bluesky was an empty place, I wanted to use it but there wasn't anything. Now its bustling, there are interesting posts and they receive thousands of likes.

On the other hand Twitter still feels like where things are actually happening but more and more feels like they are about to start terminating anyone with eyeglasses.

I was there when the Digg exodus happened, it doesn't feel like that. It's something else. It feels like Twitter becoming a monoculture and others are having their monoculture somewhere else because Bluesky also doesn't feel diverse to me - more like the opposite of Twitter.

replies(7): >>42151254 #>>42151594 #>>42152032 #>>42152290 #>>42152544 #>>42153759 #>>42156528 #
1. gorwell ◴[16 Nov 24 03:00 UTC] No.42153759[source]▶
Bluesky is the blue version of Gab. You'll find that it's an ideological echo chamber and gets uninteresting fast.

The difference is that this version of Twitter isn't censoring and banning people for wrongthink. The people leaving are self selecting out of the idea gene pool, as opposed to being forced out.

Naval wrote it well, "Rigid ideologues move but the persuadable center does not. So they just move into irrelevance."