←back to thread

Consuming the Bluesky firehose for less than $2.50/mo

(bsky.bad-example.com)
239 points colinprince | 2 comments | 15 Nov 24 23:13 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
hobs ◴[16 Nov 24 00:22 UTC] No.42152933[source]▶
I dont understand why I would build on bluesky when it seems like it would have the same medium term issues that the twitter api had anyway, but enjoy it while it lasts I guess.
replies(1): >>42153082 #
marviel ◴[16 Nov 24 00:46 UTC] No.42153082[source]▶
say more? I thought the protocol was designed to be able to handle decentralization
replies(2): >>42153266 #>>42153304 #
Zamiel_Snawley ◴[16 Nov 24 01:17 UTC] No.42153304[source]▶
There is still major centralization. Essentially, the relays crawl the network and provide an aggregated data stream, their firehose.

Independent relays can exist, which is better than the fully centralized options.

There is no financial incentive to bear the cost of running a public relay.

replies(1): >>42153383 #
1. marviel ◴[16 Nov 24 01:35 UTC] No.42153383[source]▶
Thank you for the explanation!

Are there efforts to build a similar type of network which rewards running a public relay? I'm not sure how, for instance, Mastodon solves this problem

replies(1): >>42153469 #
2. Zamiel_Snawley ◴[16 Nov 24 01:58 UTC] No.42153469[source]▶
Mastodon has a completely different architecture.

In Activity Pub each node is essentially the full stack of what ATProto breaks up into individual entities. This means that each node in the fediverse is incented to connect to other nodes in the network, to provide good coverage to their users.