(bsky.bad-example.com)

239 points colinprince | 3 comments | 15 Nov 24 23:13 UTC | HN request time: 0.598s | source

Show context

hobs ◴[16 Nov 24 00:22 UTC] No.42152933[source]▶

I dont understand why I would build on bluesky when it seems like it would have the same medium term issues that the twitter api had anyway, but enjoy it while it lasts I guess.

replies(1): >>42153082 #

marviel ◴[16 Nov 24 00:46 UTC] No.42153082[source]▶

>>42152933 #

say more? I thought the protocol was designed to be able to handle decentralization

replies(2): >>42153266 #>>42153304 #

1. koolala ◴[16 Nov 24 01:10 UTC] No.42153266[source]▶

>>42153082 #

So a firehose isn't different than re-hosting Bluesky and it encourages re-hosting?

replies(1): >>42153289 #

2. marviel ◴[16 Nov 24 01:14 UTC] No.42153289[source]▶

>>42153266 (TP) #

If you're critiquing, could you spell out your point more plainly?

replies(1): >>42184839 #

3. koolala ◴[19 Nov 24 15:55 UTC] No.42184839[source]▶

>>42153289 #

I was just trying to extrapolate. Seems like if you can manage the firehose you could almost host your own indepenant non-central interface.

↑

Consuming the Bluesky firehose for less than $2.50/mo