←back to thread

307 points MBCook | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.417s | source
1. floxy ◴[] No.42152974[source]
It is better. But in the year 2024, why should I believe the data from a random source, with unknown data analysis? When will they be releasing their data package for independent analysis? Why isn't this the expected norm? And how can we make it so?
replies(1): >>42159530 #
2. altairprime ◴[] No.42159530[source]
Did you email them to ask for it? What sort of meta-analysis do you intend to do with their data? Have you released other interesting work in this field that would benefit the post? Why weren’t your intentions for their model published in your comment? What can we do to denormalize rhetoric in forum discussions?