Most active commenters
  • llm_trw(3)

←back to thread

461 points GavinAnderegg | 12 comments | | HN request time: 0.621s | source | bottom
1. EmersonL ◴[] No.42152439[source]
I loved Twitter. It was this magic place where I could connect with both friends and legends in my field (programmers). That’s not what it is anymore and it’s impossible to ignore how political it’s become.

Bluesky feels like Twitter used to and it’s shockingly refreshing to hear about industry news and friendly updates rather than some “pick-up artist” explaining how women are too privileged these days.

replies(4): >>42152551 #>>42156340 #>>42165453 #>>42193324 #
2. llm_trw ◴[] No.42152551[source]
The first post when I opened it after reading yours:

>The same people who’ve spent the last several years decrying “unqualified DEI hires” are now shoehorning through Cabinet nominations who can’t even pass a basic background test.

This is the opposite of what I want in any app I open. It's time we stop chasing engagement for sites and start filtering for content. I want sites that don't promise to be the place to do everything for everyone but one's which I can judge on their censorship to know if I want to join.

replies(2): >>42152962 #>>42153395 #
3. EmersonL ◴[] No.42152962[source]
Bummer, sorry to hear this!
replies(1): >>42154371 #
4. archagon ◴[] No.42153395[source]
Well, Threads does that[1]. So it seems to mostly be full of menial banter, if that's up your alley.

[1]: https://about.instagram.com/blog/announcements/continuing-ou...

replies(1): >>42153710 #
5. llm_trw ◴[] No.42153710{3}[source]
It isn't. I want a place where people leave their politics, religion and genitals at the door. Op made it seem like bluesky did that. A look at the front page says otherwise.
replies(1): >>42153809 #
6. ◴[] No.42153809{4}[source]
7. llm_trw ◴[] No.42154371{3}[source]
It seems like it's complete luck of the draw on what the front page looks like before you sign up.

I refreshed once after posting that and it looked amazing enough to come back and post here that it does look great now. Refreshed again and got this at the top: https://bsky.app/profile/rexchapman.bsky.social/post/3lazzns... here's hoping they stop amplifying the people who made twitter so toxic and make a network that's actually pleasant to be in.

8. horns4lyfe ◴[] No.42156340[source]
It was also a magical place that gave the CIA carte Blanche to monitor Americans and spread propaganda, and was happy to censor in behalf of the federal government. that’s my beef with the folksy view of old Twitter
replies(2): >>42156371 #>>42156796 #
9. hollerith ◴[] No.42156371[source]
Also, its "format" probably contributed significantly to political polarization: specifically, restricting tweets to 140 characters made it tedious for a writer to provide and a reader to obtain a detailed explanation of anything, but made it easier for a writer to join a mob with a simple message.
10. verzali ◴[] No.42156796[source]
But that hasn't changed. If anything it's going to be far worse. The owner of Twitter is literally going to be part of the Federal government. It seems naive to think he won't manipulate or censor it on behalf of the government or his own interests.
11. IAmGraydon ◴[] No.42165453[source]
> I loved Twitter. It was this magic place where I could connect with both friends and legends in my field (programmers). That’s not what it is anymore and it’s impossible to ignore how political it’s become.

It is a program. What has become political is society. Bluesky and Twitter are just the two sides of the fracture manifesting as online discussion spaces. Bluesky users are just as polarized as Twitter users, but perhaps more in line with what you’re comfortable with reading.

12. z3ncyberpunk ◴[] No.42193324[source]
Bluesky is overwhelmingly the same hyper-political cult spam, just painted blue. To say it isn't political is just blatantly ignorant.