←back to thread

461 points GavinAnderegg | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
llm_nerd ◴[] No.42150659[source]
Whatever one's feelings about these microblogging services, one truth that has become clear is that none of them -- X, Bluesky, Threads, or anything similar -- should be considered "the commons". They're private businesses with their own motives that are often in complete conflict with your own.

A lot of people made the mistake of treating Twitter like a commons and have been burned. My local police force posts all notices about traffic, missing people, foiled crimes, etc., on Twitter out of inertia. That is wholly inappropriate, and wasn't appropriate even when before it become some brain-worm infected oligarch's rhetoric megaphone. The same goes for many organizations, politicians, and so on. It was never the right choice. And the solution to one bad choice isn't to move to the same mistake on some other service. These people and orgs need absolute and complete ownership over their own platform.

Mastodon / ActivityPub seems like it might scratch that itch, but what a bloated sloppy mess that is. The right idea, with the wrong implementation.

Honestly would prefer all these people and places just published RSS feeds.

replies(28): >>42150683 #>>42150684 #>>42150744 #>>42150850 #>>42150873 #>>42150981 #>>42151263 #>>42151430 #>>42151636 #>>42151681 #>>42151708 #>>42151751 #>>42151778 #>>42151821 #>>42151829 #>>42151891 #>>42151943 #>>42152097 #>>42152127 #>>42152162 #>>42152180 #>>42152186 #>>42152189 #>>42152190 #>>42152192 #>>42152442 #>>42153655 #>>42154091 #
krisoft ◴[] No.42151821[source]
> That is wholly inappropriate, and wasn't appropriate even when before it become some brain-worm infected oligarch's rhetoric megaphone.

When you want to reach people you go to where the people are. You fish where the fish is. It is that simple. People did not join twitter because the police was posting there, the police post on twitter because that is where they can reach the people.

replies(7): >>42151962 #>>42151973 #>>42152095 #>>42152182 #>>42152229 #>>42152255 #>>42176494 #
asah ◴[] No.42152095[source]
Twitter was never a majority of Americans let alone 80-90+% share that justifies being a single outlet for a taxpayer funded agency.
replies(1): >>42152137 #
krapp ◴[] No.42152137[source]
An account costs nothing. You get an intern or someone to post on it now and then. It isn't exactly a deep commitment.
replies(1): >>42152201 #
1. apsurd ◴[] No.42152201[source]
That's not the argument at all.

These public entities post _exclusively_ on Twitter as if it's the public square. It's not and it shouldn't be. The argument is not about how easy it is to create a Twitter account.

replies(1): >>42152243 #
2. irundebian ◴[] No.42152243[source]
Please give me an example of a police station which post exclusively on Twitter.
replies(1): >>42154700 #
3. throwthrowrow ◴[] No.42154700[source]
Does DOGE (Dept of Govt Efficiency) post exclusively on Twitter? Just wondering