←back to thread

Maybe Bluesky has "won"

(anderegg.ca)
461 points GavinAnderegg | 1 comments | 15 Nov 24 19:56 UTC | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
skwee357 ◴[15 Nov 24 20:32 UTC] No.42150633[source]▶
I find it funny how hard people try to push the “BlueSky is better than twitter” narrative. So hard, that my entire BlueSky feed is filled with Twitter refugees who shit post about twitter being bad.

Maybe instead of having yet another echo chamber of short form content, we should embrace long form, well written content with wide range of opinions.

replies(1): >>42150713 #
minimaxir ◴[15 Nov 24 20:37 UTC] No.42150713[source]▶
Social networks have been algorithmically deprioritizing long form/well-written content, with Twitter/X being the most egregious offender.

Atleast Bluesky has a chronological feed without shenanigans.

replies(1): >>42150954 #
1. skwee357 ◴[15 Nov 24 20:58 UTC] No.42150954[source]▶
I don’t think the problem is the algorithmic or chronological feed.

I think the problem is that short form content simply should not exit. I don’t care what people eat for breakfast, or reading the same motivation quote over and over again.

I want to have discussions, with different opinions. And current microblogging platforms do not provide that. Hence it doesn’t matter who “wins”. IMHO they are all net negative for humanity