←back to thread

Maybe Bluesky has "won"

(anderegg.ca)
461 points GavinAnderegg | 3 comments | 15 Nov 24 19:56 UTC | HN request time: 0.88s | source
Show context
jl6 ◴[15 Nov 24 20:29 UTC] No.42150608[source]▶
The true rival to X is not using social media at all. If you’re mad at your Skinner box, switching bubbles won’t improve your life.
replies(7): >>42150640 #>>42150690 #>>42150766 #>>42150790 #>>42150874 #>>42150965 #>>42155573 #
1. cmxch ◴[15 Nov 24 20:44 UTC] No.42150790[source]▶
Correct.

Essentially you’re switching one filter bubble for another filter bubble that makes it harder for any contrary opinion to pierce it.

replies(1): >>42150836 #
2. downWidOutaFite ◴[15 Nov 24 20:48 UTC] No.42150836[source]▶
The horde of right wing blue checks that dominate all popular political tweets is not a filter bubble. It is a user-hostile feature that makes organic political interactions impossible on the platform. It turns a peer-to-peer network into top-down broadcast.
replies(1): >>42152357 #
3. mnau ◴[15 Nov 24 23:12 UTC] No.42152357[source]▶
In days of LLM, 99 out of 100 users are likely bots. That is probably also true for bluesky.

Like it or hate it, spending money is about the only semi-reliable defense against boting.