←back to thread

73 points mykowebhn | 9 comments | | HN request time: 0.304s | source | bottom
1. tiahura ◴[] No.42150082[source]
So, butylene rubber, a petroleum-based industrial adhesive. Meanwhile, Ottawa thinks it's plant based.
replies(2): >>42150190 #>>42190967 #
2. NotSammyHagar ◴[] No.42150190[source]
the article doesn't say it, but this all suggests someone probably had a bunch of old crap in a tank and dumped in the ocean. Maybe it was a giant ocean liner amount of it. Right? Why does no one want to just say that outright?
replies(2): >>42150267 #>>42150582 #
3. Scoundreller ◴[] No.42150267[source]
Mostly because the article is about a chemist focussed on identifying WTF it is and less so an expert in shipping/unreported damage/clandestine dumping.
replies(1): >>42190940 #
4. chasil ◴[] No.42150582[source]
Alternately, shipping containers are regularly lost from container ships.

The article doesn't say if this was closer to raw material or waste.

replies(1): >>42174830 #
5. NotSammyHagar ◴[] No.42174830{3}[source]
Good point, didn't think about that stuff falls off ships pretty commonly.
6. whythre ◴[] No.42190940{3}[source]
Seems like goofy credentialism. Large amounts of this stuff don’t just appear; someone put it there. Why do we need an expert in ‘clandestine dumping’ to tell us that?
replies(1): >>42191055 #
7. labster ◴[] No.42190967[source]
Nothing to worry about, it’s just Elon building Galt’s Gulch in the middle of the Canadian wilderness.
8. akira2501 ◴[] No.42191055{4}[source]
> expert in ‘clandestine dumping’

Do bears clandestinely dump in the woods?

replies(1): >>42193584 #
9. guerrilla ◴[] No.42193584{5}[source]
Only when nobody's looking.