←back to thread

Please stop the coding challenges

(blackentropy.bearblog.dev)
261 points CrazyEmi | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
Show context
factotum ◴[] No.42148112[source]
I'm fine with tests, but only if companies pay a standard fee (say, $100) for a dev's time. If a company doesn't respect your time during the interview process, it probably won't while you're on the job.
replies(2): >>42148170 #>>42148251 #
syndicatedjelly ◴[] No.42148170[source]
This is such an out-of-touch and ridiculous thing to say
replies(1): >>42148266 #
1. factotum ◴[] No.42148266[source]
And why is that? Do you not agree that time is our most valuable asset?
replies(1): >>42148376 #
2. exitb ◴[] No.42148376[source]
Interviewing is a time investment for both sides. Should the company charge you to evaluate your skills?
replies(3): >>42148611 #>>42149235 #>>42150184 #
3. kstrauser ◴[] No.42148611[source]
Is that not literally LeetCode Premium?
4. fluoridation ◴[] No.42149235[source]
When the interviewee is asked to complete an assignment, they have to invest substantially more time than their counterpart.
5. AnimalMuppet ◴[] No.42150184[source]
If someone gives me a take-home assignment that I spend 4 hours on, there is no commitment of time on their side. They may decide to not even look at the results. They may spend five minutes on it.

That's exactly my problem with take-home code challenges. If I go to an interview, and they waste my time, they have to waste their own. But with a take-home assignment, they can waste my time without wasting their own. That may lead them to be more wasteful of my time.

replies(1): >>42150947 #
6. exitb ◴[] No.42150947{3}[source]
If that’s the case - sure. But that’s not inherent to code challenges. I evaluate results of challenges at work, they require 2-3 hours of candidate time and it rarely takes less than half of that time to fully evaluate and form a recommendation.