←back to thread

Looking for a Job Is Tough

(blog.kaplich.me)
184 points skaplich | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
thw09j9m ◴[] No.42132752[source]
This is the toughest market I've ever seen. I easily made it to on-sites at FAANG a few years ago and now I'm getting resume rejected by no-name startups (and FAANG).

The bar has also been raised significantly. I had an interview recently where I solved the algorithm question very quickly, but didn't refactor/clean up my code perfectly and was rejected.

replies(12): >>42132828 #>>42132878 #>>42132900 #>>42132935 #>>42133185 #>>42133278 #>>42138532 #>>42138559 #>>42139442 #>>42140920 #>>42143310 #>>42145184 #
trentnix ◴[] No.42132828[source]
I’m not sure the bar has been raised. It’s been weirded, but not raised.
replies(2): >>42132918 #>>42136416 #
briandear ◴[] No.42136416[source]
The bar has been lowered in many respects. 14 years experience, 5 of them at a FAANG. Successful startup exit for a small company I founded, and and endless array of India-based recruiters that, for example, want me to mention “Ruby 3.2” in my resume when the resume says I have 14 years of Ruby experience including using it daily in my present job. I could literally say “I invented Ruby and have worked with it daily for 20 years,” and they’d say, “but you don’t have 3.2 listed.”

I play the game then they pass me off to another Indian who is less understandable than the first guy and then they offer $45/hour. I say yeah sure, submit me to the potential client. Then I never hear anything back.

The Indian 3rd party recruiting industry is absolutely horrible. Another anecdote was spending 10 minutes explaining how Java and JavaScript aren’t the same thing. I am convinced there is rampant discrimination happening as well against non-Indians, and especially those who aren’t H1Bs. (H1B is a trap that makes it easy to hire people at lower wages and then also makes it harder for them to switch employers.)

I’m not well articulating the problem, but anyone who has done this dance knows exactly what I’m talking about.

By the way, I used to contract at $95/hour and now I can’t get calls back for $45/hour.

The outsourcing offshoring business needs to be significantly reformed. I had a gig at Best Buy ($70/hour) and I got to spend 3 months training some Accenture H1Bs to replace me. I thought H1B was to fill “critical shortages of highly skilled workers?” Best Buy didn’t have a shortage — they fired my entire team and replaced it with Accenture. Best Buy should be heavily taxed for that and Accenture et al should have their offshore labor tariffed into oblivion. (They typically have onshore H1Bs directing offshore teams.) The Best Buy CEO talks all sorts of DEI crap, while firing people to cut costs. Not very inclusive if you ask me.

replies(5): >>42136556 #>>42136596 #>>42136875 #>>42139212 #>>42149018 #
mathverse ◴[] No.42136556[source]
Indians,Brazilians,Portuguese,Ukrainians,Russians are possibly the worst clique of discriminative nationalities. You can be 100% assured that you will be driven out of a company/job if more of them take a hold and get into higher up positions. This is not racism. This is a pure fact based on statistical evidence.

You will be sold a dream of infinite scalability by hiring "talent" in those countries for cheap and what you will get is usually disfunctional teams riddled with incompetence and nepotism.

Even if a job/team is meant to be multicultural,diverse they will find a way how to hire more and more of their countrymen until knowing the language is basically a requirement for the job.

I am not even an american and i've seen this happen in Europe as well so I imagine in the US it must be 1000 times worse.

replies(3): >>42137807 #>>42148012 #>>42157127 #
snapcaster ◴[] No.42137807[source]
Can you link some of the facts/evidence?
replies(2): >>42140367 #>>42140407 #
randomdata ◴[] No.42140407[source]
What are you offering in return?
replies(1): >>42148153 #
1. red-iron-pine ◴[] No.42148153{3}[source]
credulity. extra-ordinary facts require extortionary evidence.

plus the above poster mentioned how it's well known, "based on statistical evidence". so show us.