←back to thread

688 points crescit_eundo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.236s | source
Show context
niobe ◴[] No.42142885[source]
I don't understand why educated people expect that an LLM would be able to play chess at a decent level.

It has no idea about the quality of it's data. "Act like x" prompts are no substitute for actual reasoning and deterministic computation which clearly chess requires.

replies(20): >>42142963 #>>42143021 #>>42143024 #>>42143060 #>>42143136 #>>42143208 #>>42143253 #>>42143349 #>>42143949 #>>42144041 #>>42144146 #>>42144448 #>>42144487 #>>42144490 #>>42144558 #>>42144621 #>>42145171 #>>42145383 #>>42146513 #>>42147230 #
motoboi ◴[] No.42146513[source]
I suppose you didn't get the news, but google developed a LLM that can play chess. And play it at grandmaster level: https://arxiv.org/html/2402.04494v1
replies(3): >>42146547 #>>42146583 #>>42147933 #
1. teleforce ◴[] No.42147933[source]
It's interesting to note that the paper benchmarked its chess playing performance against GPT-3.5-turbo-instruct, the only well performant LLM in the posted article.