←back to thread

286 points joegibbs | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
gnabgib ◴[] No.42143461[source]
Previously (36 points, 6 days ago, 24 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42090636

Related Cops suspect iOS 18 iPhones are communicating to force reboots (234 points, 7 days ago, 288 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42081874

replies(1): >>42144315 #
xk_id ◴[] No.42144315[source]
I just want to point and shame this top-voted comment [0] that dismissed with the characteristic self-assurance of the armchair specialist the very possibility of it; and all the users who upvoted it, purely because it sounded like a “rational opinion”; and all the users who impulsively downvoted my post which provided partial evidence to the contrary.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42083555

replies(2): >>42144410 #>>42144853 #
1. LegionMammal978 ◴[] No.42144410[source]
They are forcing reboots, but they aren't communicating with each other to force reboots, as the article was speculating, and as the commenter was arguing against. Instead, it's just a 72-hour clock.

Also, they were calling the networking hypothesis "far fetched" and "pretty unlikely", not "impossible". I had also considered that hypothesis far-fetched, because it wouldn't just need the existence of local communication, it would also need a special protocol, trigger conditions, false-positive prevention, etc., all for that one feature.