←back to thread

251 points lewq | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.235s | source
Show context
JSDevOps ◴[] No.42136819[source]
Is anyone instantly suspicious when they introduce themselves these days an "AI Developer"
replies(8): >>42136909 #>>42136984 #>>42137147 #>>42137171 #>>42137380 #>>42137938 #>>42137950 #>>42140294 #
master-lincoln ◴[] No.42137938[source]
I would interpret that as somebody working on ML algorithms and architectures, not somebody developing a product that uses some form of AI at runtime...
replies(2): >>42138131 #>>42138404 #
JohnFen ◴[] No.42138404[source]
I work on such a team, and we don't refer to ourselves as "AI engineers". We're devs working on developing deep learning systems (but not genAI).
replies(2): >>42139765 #>>42140655 #
swyx ◴[] No.42139765[source]
correct - but "developing a product that uses some form of AI at runtime" is a job that people do and the community has consolidated around "AI engineer" as shorthand https://www.latent.space/p/ai-engineer

i argue that its useful to have these shorthands to quickly understand what people do. its not so nice to just be default suspicious at a perhaps lower-technical-difficulty job that nevertheless a lot of comapnies want and a lot of people do

replies(3): >>42140311 #>>42140953 #>>42143882 #
1. throwaway290 ◴[] No.42143882[source]
Why is it lower difficulty? If didn't get that impression from the article