←back to thread

MIT engineers make converting CO2 into useful products more practical

(news.mit.edu)
173 points rbanffy | 1 comments | 13 Nov 24 15:42 UTC | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
mchannon ◴[13 Nov 24 16:27 UTC] No.42127456[source]▶
The writer appears to be under the impression that CO2 is not a valuable commodity.

In fact, it is, so long as it's under enough pressure, and in the right place. In Montezuma County, Colorado, sits the McElmo dome, an ancient underground CO2 well. They pump it out, down a 500 mile pipeline, to Denver City, Texas, where it gooses oil wells into pumping more crude out. Other than making more oil and making it cheaper, not really much in terms of greenhouse gas contributions- the CO2 starts underground and ends up underground.

Kinder Morgan won't just let you back up your truck and buy some (it's already spoken for), and even if they would, they'd expect you to pay a pretty penny for what we widely consider to be waste gas.

I think MIT is doing some good work. Just wanted everyone to be mindful of the massive scale under which CO2 is already getting bought and sold.

replies(7): >>42127501 #>>42127714 #>>42127942 #>>42127946 #>>42128043 #>>42128376 #>>42130689 #
rhelz ◴[13 Nov 24 17:14 UTC] No.42127942[source]▶
The application you mention does not rely on the gas being co2 at all. The gas is being used because it is in a high pressure reservoir. It could by any gas. The C02 itself is literally free because it is literally in the atmosphere all around us.
replies(3): >>42127998 #>>42128370 #>>42129927 #
kaibee ◴[13 Nov 24 20:58 UTC] No.42129927[source]▶
> The C02 itself is literally free because it is literally in the atmosphere all around us.

Not exactly.

> The concentration of carbon dioxide (CO 2) in the atmosphere reach 427 ppm (0.04%) in 2024.

Any process that tries to unmix something is not going to be 'literally' free. And given the relative trace amounts we're talking here...

replies(1): >>42143476 #
1. rhelz ◴[15 Nov 24 02:36 UTC] No.42143476[source]▶
That was exactly my point. What makes the co2 referred valuable is not that it is co2. We literally (not metaphorically, or hyperbolically, but literally) are surrounded by the stuff every day of our lives.

What makes it valuable is that the co2 is concentrated and under pressure. But pretty much any gas would fit the bill.

And let's not forget, the original article was about MIT scientists making extracting co2 from the atmosphere "more efficient". Which, as you point out, is a rather hopeless quest---in order to get the co2 back out of the atmosphere, you'd need more energy than you got from burning whatever put it there in the first place.

So making any meaningful dent in the atmospheric co2 by extraction/converting a mug's game. You'd need on the order of the entire amount of energy used by the human race during the entire industrial age.