←back to thread

717 points ortusdux | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
xnx ◴[] No.42138885[source]
Seems like the logical endpoint of a lot of this is people getting paid directly for their attention. Want to call me? I've set a price of $5/call that I answer, and an additional $10/minute of listen time after the first 10 seconds. Want to send me an email? $1/email and $5/100 words. Anyone I have emailed is automatically on my allow-list, which I can also adjust manually.
replies(12): >>42139147 #>>42139164 #>>42139519 #>>42139522 #>>42139766 #>>42141330 #>>42141511 #>>42141816 #>>42142129 #>>42143384 #>>42143710 #>>42144710 #
bawolff ◴[] No.42139522[source]
If you have already sorted the world between people you want to take calls from and people you don't, why wouldn't you just block the people you don't want instead of charging them money?
replies(2): >>42139629 #>>42139780 #
xnx ◴[] No.42139780[source]
My attention is valuable. I should be able to sell it on my terms.
replies(3): >>42140232 #>>42140688 #>>42140987 #
bawolff ◴[] No.42140688[source]
Is it though? Like it might be valuable to you, but i doubt its valuable to anyone else in a phone call situation and both parties need to find value to make a sale.

Like if you are interested in the convo then you should be paying the other person as you are getting value from the convo.

What's the situation where you don't care about the convo but for the right price you could care, and the other party also thinks that price is reasonable? Like maybe if someone is trying to recruit you i guess, but the situations where that is true seem very few and far between (and we already have a system for that, where traditionally someone offers to buy you a meal in exchange for listening)

replies(2): >>42140993 #>>42142057 #
1. lozf ◴[] No.42140993[source]
> Is it though?

Marketers seem to think so, or they wouldn't waste their time calling.