←back to thread

249 points jaboutboul | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
neilv ◴[] No.42131010[source]
> "This is obvious political retribution by the outgoing administration against Polymarket for providing a market that correctly called the 2024 presidential election," a Polymarket spokesperson tells Axios.

When I saw that statement, from a company spokesperson, it was striking.

Is it now respectable and advisable for a corporation to make official statements like this?

replies(11): >>42131031 #>>42131033 #>>42131037 #>>42131288 #>>42131422 #>>42131547 #>>42131653 #>>42131753 #>>42132315 #>>42132991 #>>42136393 #
qgin ◴[] No.42132991[source]
It’s a signal to the incoming President to protect them ASAP
replies(2): >>42136459 #>>42139167 #
bookofjoe ◴[] No.42136459[source]
>Elon Musk, the richest man in the world and one of the president-elect’s closest advisors, wrote, “This seems messed up” in response to the news.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/nov/13/fbi-raid-...

replies(2): >>42140504 #>>42162436 #
1. curt15 ◴[] No.42140504{3}[source]
Elon likes to weigh in on all sorts of matters outside his domain, such as UK or Italian politics. He's a classic example of intensity matching. Building rockets and cars doesn't transfer to credibility on non-scientific matters.