←back to thread

249 points jaboutboul | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
neilv ◴[] No.42131010[source]
> "This is obvious political retribution by the outgoing administration against Polymarket for providing a market that correctly called the 2024 presidential election," a Polymarket spokesperson tells Axios.

When I saw that statement, from a company spokesperson, it was striking.

Is it now respectable and advisable for a corporation to make official statements like this?

replies(11): >>42131031 #>>42131033 #>>42131037 #>>42131288 #>>42131422 #>>42131547 #>>42131653 #>>42131753 #>>42132315 #>>42132991 #>>42136393 #
andy_xor_andrew ◴[] No.42131288[source]
Respectable and advisable? No. Smart? Yes.

Their audience here is the incoming administration, which is founded on party loyalty and an "us-vs-them" mindset, where "them" are the corrupt elites.

They're making a bet that whoever is prosecuting them in 4 months is going to be a lot friendlier to them if they act like victims of a vengeful democratic elite, and they're probably right. Really smart, honestly.

replies(2): >>42131337 #>>42131342 #
rozap ◴[] No.42131342[source]
Given Peter Thiel is a big investor in polymarket, and is JD Vance's daddy, I'm sure they will have no problem getting this case dismissed.
replies(1): >>42140230 #
1. mrkramer ◴[] No.42140230[source]
Before you place bets on Polymarket you need to check the box which says something like this: "I promise I'm not from US". Pinky swear that I'm not using VPN to place illegal bets. That's why FBI is investigating them, so case still hangs in the balance.