←back to thread

391 points JSeymourATL | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bradley13 ◴[] No.42136901[source]
I once applied for a job that precisely matched my qualifications. It was crazy - the job description could have been written by someone looking at my CV.

I didn't even get an interview. Likely no one did.

It wasn't a ghost job, though. It was a position created for a someone they wanted to hire. Being a public institution, they were required to advertise positions. That didn't mean that they actually wanted any of the candidates who applied.

replies(15): >>42137039 #>>42137115 #>>42137277 #>>42137590 #>>42137751 #>>42137990 #>>42138291 #>>42138836 #>>42139139 #>>42139441 #>>42139450 #>>42139563 #>>42139682 #>>42139867 #>>42140199 #
goochphd ◴[] No.42137277[source]
I once applied to a position like this. It was eerily similar to my background, and when I did a little digging I found that the group lead had even directly cited my research papers in his own research work.

I applied on the site, reached out on LinkedIn to the group lead and the recruiter, and even was able to find emails for those two, which I also messaged as well.

They didn't even bother to send me an automated rejection notice. There was nothing at all, no responses to any messages, no email, nothing. I have to assume that position was posted with someone already in mind that they wanted to hire.

replies(2): >>42137809 #>>42138183 #
endtime ◴[] No.42137809[source]
When I last changed jobs, I started looking at the end of 2021. I was a staff SWE at Google, MS CS from Stanford, etc. - a good resume.

I also found myself applying into a black hole. But when I used second degree connections to get someone at the company to acknowledge I existed, everything started moving, and I ended up with great offers from both the companies I had applied in.

Sometimes there are ghost roles, but sometimes recruiting is inundated or disorganized and you just need an internal champion.

replies(4): >>42138102 #>>42139299 #>>42139431 #>>42143923 #
Muromec ◴[] No.42139431[source]
>an internal champion.

It's an interesting way to spell "corruption".

replies(2): >>42140107 #>>42140158 #
1. ghaff ◴[] No.42140158[source]
And "corruption" is an interesting way of saying that you don't think personal connections should pay into business decisions but I realize many folks in tech roles think that way.
replies(1): >>42142551 #
2. John_Cena ◴[] No.42142551[source]
Yeah we refuse the ethics-twisting of suits; that much is certain.