←back to thread

283 points IdealeZahlen | 8 comments | | HN request time: 0.628s | source | bottom
1. science4sail ◴[] No.42140143[source]
I must confess that I have an irrational fondness for the use of weird symbols in math and technical documents, whether it's for a homework assignment in school or a white-paper for work.

My unit tests are literally full of hieroglyphics. My favorite design doc to this day is one where I sprinkled Sumerian cuneiform throughout the text, e.g. 𒀭𒄑𒉋𒂵𒎌 and 𒂗𒆠𒄭 (Gilgamesh and Enkidu) instead of Alice and Bob.

replies(5): >>42140615 #>>42140887 #>>42141526 #>>42144467 #>>42147941 #
2. a57721 ◴[] No.42140615[source]
I'm not sure if this is a good idea, especially in code; apart from adding unnecessary confusion for the reader, this will also confuse some monospaced fonts.
replies(1): >>42140884 #
3. wil421 ◴[] No.42140884[source]
Glad I’m not GPs coworker. Time to refactor Gilgamesh.
4. gweinberg ◴[] No.42140887[source]
I just see boxes, not the cuneiform.
replies(1): >>42143998 #
5. Aloisius ◴[] No.42141526[source]
I've seen emoji used for Alice/Bob/Carol/etc which is a bit more widely supported than old dead scripts.

I await the inevitable mathematical constant unicorn emoji.

6. starfezzy ◴[] No.42143998[source]
`pacman -S noto-fonts noto-fonts-cjk noto-fonts-emoji`
7. winwang ◴[] No.42144467[source]
I was following you up until that first comma.
8. BalinKing ◴[] No.42147941[source]
Reminds me of Lamport's original paper on Paxos, in which he eschewed Alice, Bob, et al. in favor of ∆˘ικστρα, Γωυδα, Πνυeλ˘ι, and a whole host more.