←back to thread

706 points ortusdux | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
xnx ◴[] No.42138885[source]
Seems like the logical endpoint of a lot of this is people getting paid directly for their attention. Want to call me? I've set a price of $5/call that I answer, and an additional $10/minute of listen time after the first 10 seconds. Want to send me an email? $1/email and $5/100 words. Anyone I have emailed is automatically on my allow-list, which I can also adjust manually.
replies(12): >>42139147 #>>42139164 #>>42139519 #>>42139522 #>>42139766 #>>42141330 #>>42141511 #>>42141816 #>>42142129 #>>42143384 #>>42143710 #>>42144710 #
guidoism ◴[] No.42139519[source]
That's similar to the idea I had for combating texting spam: - If your number is in my address book then texts are free for you - If this is the first time you are contacting me then you pay me $1

There are probably downsides and ways this will screw up real relationships but it will certainly increase the cost of spam.

replies(2): >>42139601 #>>42141223 #
Nition ◴[] No.42139601[source]
One issue I can forsee:

- Every contractor (plumber etc) you hire will ask you to please add them to your contact list first so that they can message you.

- After a while of half their clients not doing that and lots of fees on their end, contractors stop providing a phone number at all, asking you to please install ContractorApp to communicate with them.

replies(5): >>42139777 #>>42139815 #>>42140812 #>>42141207 #>>42146202 #
1. thejazzman ◴[] No.42139777{3}[source]
I love every part of this. Not having things in writing is one of the most common tactics with bad contractors. And I miss their call backs because I have unknowns goto spam, so I have to remember to disable that feature...