←back to thread

189 points udev4096 | 5 comments | | HN request time: 1.955s | source
Show context
wvh ◴[] No.42138009[source]
Identity, authn and authn are hard. A failure in the code, logic or at the seams messes up everything that it tries to protect. There are a few big commercial players trying to take the market with their "social login", and a few smaller (open-source) players trying to compete and survive, walking a fine line between open-source and open-core.

I feel this is one avenue where a few open-source players should get some solid funding and support from both the organisations and governments that use their software so we don't end up with unmaintained bug-riddled code and have to login with Google or Facebook everywhere.

A lot of the government agencies I work with use open-source IdP software (because they have to privacy- and policy-wise), so some healthy funding model should be possible for people with the skill and interest.

replies(5): >>42138508 #>>42138602 #>>42139245 #>>42139296 #>>42140612 #
1. apitman ◴[] No.42138508[source]
I maintain a reasonably good table of the open source options here: https://github.com/lastlogin-net/obligator?tab=readme-ov-fil...
replies(3): >>42138775 #>>42139650 #>>42146110 #
2. cinntaile ◴[] No.42138775[source]
Assuming this is a rather complete list... It's interesting that most were written in Go.
replies(1): >>42139973 #
3. mjcohen ◴[] No.42139650[source]
What is Vanity?
4. rnewme ◴[] No.42139973[source]
And how it has little dependencies
5. moribvndvs ◴[] No.42146110[source]
Any insight on supertokens? https://supertokens.com/