←back to thread

Looking for a Job Is Tough

(blog.kaplich.me)
184 points skaplich | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
thw09j9m ◴[] No.42132752[source]
This is the toughest market I've ever seen. I easily made it to on-sites at FAANG a few years ago and now I'm getting resume rejected by no-name startups (and FAANG).

The bar has also been raised significantly. I had an interview recently where I solved the algorithm question very quickly, but didn't refactor/clean up my code perfectly and was rejected.

replies(12): >>42132828 #>>42132878 #>>42132900 #>>42132935 #>>42133185 #>>42133278 #>>42138532 #>>42138559 #>>42139442 #>>42140920 #>>42143310 #>>42145184 #
trentnix ◴[] No.42132828[source]
I’m not sure the bar has been raised. It’s been weirded, but not raised.
replies(2): >>42132918 #>>42136416 #
realityfactchex ◴[] No.42132918[source]
Weirded how, if you don't mind elaborating slightly?

For example, does it mean: the actual skill level (e.g., smartness) people actually look for and hire hasn't changed, but the activities that hiring teams require candidates to have experience with are (seemingly weirdly) not a great thing to need anyway and therefore lots of great candidates end up twiddling their thumbs?

In that way, the "height" of the bar is the same, but it's a "weird" bar, in that one could have to accept it for what it is, or even stoop to it, or perhaps shift over to it, in order to pass it?

Or more that the overall interview experiences are weird caricatures in and of themselves?

Weird is a great word, but it can be a little non-specific, so I'm left curious about the intended usage/meaning.

replies(2): >>42132962 #>>42133003 #
rdfc-xn-uuid[dead post] ◴[] No.42132962[source]
[flagged]
MrVandemar ◴[] No.42133108[source]
> It hurts when you see posh privileged urban women having much more chance of getting into a good company than a man who worked his way up through sacrifice.

It's not a gender issue. I would be looking to hire someone competent who works hard, not someone who makes "sacrifices" and then expects a job/promotion.

The latter never works. That's not the work culture in most places. I've seen it many times, people who make "sacrifices", allowing themselves to be exploited, expecting some promotion from it, and are then passed over for someone who actually has demonstrated they are good at the job and ready for more responsibility, and not being a doormat. Then they become resentful.

Don't be bitter. Be better.

replies(4): >>42134303 #>>42134686 #>>42136309 #>>42139933 #
throw111424[dead post] ◴[] No.42134686[source]
[flagged]
squeaky-clean ◴[] No.42136863{4}[source]
It's so peculiar that the man who thinks few women are willing to "get in the trenches" never sees women really getting into the trenches. It must definitely be because that's just how all women are. And definitely not because most women choose not to work with you or a company that perpetuates that idea.
replies(1): >>42137825 #
1. throw111424 ◴[] No.42137825{5}[source]
> It's so peculiar that the man who thinks few women are willing to "get in the trenches" never sees women really getting into the trenches.

I have seen women in the trenches but I don't see how that contradicts my claim that they are relatively few and there's probably a reason despite all the efforts to bring more women into tech.