←back to thread

250 points lewq | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.262s | source
Show context
JSDevOps ◴[] No.42136819[source]
Is anyone instantly suspicious when they introduce themselves these days an "AI Developer"
replies(8): >>42136909 #>>42136984 #>>42137147 #>>42137171 #>>42137380 #>>42137938 #>>42137950 #>>42140294 #
noch ◴[] No.42136909[source]
> Is anyone instantly suspicious when they introduce themselves these days an "AI Developer"

I'm only suspicious if they don't simultaneously and eagerly show me their Github so that I can see what they've accomplished.

replies(1): >>42137018 #
llm_nerd ◴[] No.42137018[source]
Of the great developers I have worked with in real life, across a large number of projects and workplaces, very few have any Github presence. Most don't even have LinkedIn. They usually don't have any online presence at all: No blog with regular updates. No Twitter presence full of hot takes.

Sometimes this industry is a lot like the "finance" industry: People struggling for credibility talk about it constantly, everywhere. They flex and bloviate and look for surrogates for accomplishments wherever they can be found. Peacocking on github, writing yet another tutorial on what tokens are and how embeddings work, etc.

That obviously doesn't mean in all cases, and there are loads of stellar talents that have a strong online presence. But by itself it is close to meaningless, and my experience is that it is usually a negative indicator.

replies(5): >>42137152 #>>42137381 #>>42137399 #>>42137592 #>>42138964 #
noch[dead post] ◴[] No.42137381[source]
[flagged]
1. llm_nerd ◴[] No.42137673[source]
>Saying "GitHub" is just a way of saying: "Show me what you've accomplished."

Do you actually think all development happens in public GitHub repos? Do you even think a majority does? Even a strong minority?

Across a number of enormous, well-known projects I've worked on, covering many thousands of contributors, including several very well known names, 0% of it exists in public Github repos. The overwhelming bulk of development is happening in the shadows.

If your "field" is "open source software", then sure. But if you're confused into thinking Github -- at least the tiny fraction that you can see -- is "the field" of software development or even just generally providing solutions, I can understand your weird belief about this.

replies(2): >>42137858 #>>42146361 #
2. noch ◴[] No.42146361[source]
> Do you actually think all development happens in public GitHub repos? Do you even think a majority does? Even a strong minority?

Do you think everyone you encounter is an idiot who just learned about the Internet yesterday? I started programming long before Github or Sourceforge even existed so given that all your assumptions about who you're talking to are so full of bad faith, I can only assume you have a chip on your shoulder and you don't know how to read what I wrote previously.