←back to thread

150 points sohkamyung | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
MostlyStable ◴[] No.42131693[source]
A lot of comments are focusing on the value as a RISC-V development platform, which is obviously important, but I'm also hopeful that this presages more Framework mainboard options besides just what Framework itself offers. There is already a pretty big community offering I/O modules beyond Framework's options, but the true benefit of a Framework system is in the ability to not be locked in to only what one company things is worth the time and effort to develop. This is the first inkling that that benefit might actually come about.
replies(3): >>42132202 #>>42133441 #>>42135140 #
MindSpunk ◴[] No.42132202[source]
There's not really a lot of room for anyone to make a board that isn't a curiosity or highly-specific developer platform though. Framework already have both x86 vendors covered for people who want Intel or AMD. The only other chip worth making a board for is Snapdragon X Elite. There's nothing else in the same performance class.
replies(5): >>42132448 #>>42132528 #>>42132763 #>>42133374 #>>42169840 #
bane ◴[] No.42132528[source]
There's the possibility of making mainboards with other features though, built-in FPGAs, SDRs, or maybe lower-powered x86 chips for more battery life.

I guess that all falls under "curiosity", but I really do hope that the ecosystem for framework compatible parts blow up.

replies(1): >>42133371 #
omeid2 ◴[] No.42133371[source]
lower-powered x86 has little chance anymore. In 10 years from now, just about every portable system will be ARM-like.
replies(1): >>42133579 #
timschmidt ◴[] No.42133579[source]
Performance per watt is nearly identical for the Apple M4 and the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, despite the Ryzen being manufactured on 4nm while the M4 is on 3nm: https://www.phoronix.com/review/apple-m4-intel-amd-linux/3

Sorry to burst your bubble.

replies(2): >>42133913 #>>42133965 #
WithinReason ◴[] No.42133965{3}[source]
You charts show the M4 having a more than 2x advantage in both MIPS per watt and MB per Joule over the Ryzen
replies(1): >>42134016 #
timschmidt ◴[] No.42134016{4}[source]
Read through the article. Ryzen wins a few, and from a worse node, and with off-package dram, and a much more capable GPU.
replies(1): >>42134133 #
KingOfCoders ◴[] No.42134133{5}[source]
"off-package dram"

Yes, the real ARM vs. x86 discussion will come around Ryzen Max 2025Q1 with 128mb on-package dram (hope we get desktop board manufacturers to sell this).

replies(1): >>42136369 #
1. adgjlsfhk1 ◴[] No.42136369{6}[source]
what does 128mb on package dram help with? That seems like it's way to small to suspend to ram or anything.
replies(1): >>42137657 #
2. KingOfCoders ◴[] No.42137657[source]
"640kb should be enough for everyone"

Joke aside, typo, s/mb/gb/g - thanks for catching.