←back to thread

323 points timbilt | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
jancsika ◴[] No.42132244[source]
Anecdote-- every single high school student and college student I've talked to in the past year (probably dozens) use chatgpt to write their papers.

They don't even know how to write a prompt, or in some cases even what "writing a prompt" means. They just paste the assignment in as a prompt and copy the output.

They then feed that as input to some app that detects chatgpt papers and change the wording until it flows through undetected.

One student told me that, for good measure, she runs it twice and picks and chooses sentences from each-- this apparently is a speedup to beating the ai paper detector. There are probably other arbitrarily-chosen patterns.

I've never heard of any of these students using it in any way other than holistic generation of the end product for an assignment. Most of them seem overconfident that they could write papers of similar quality if they ever tried. But so far, according to all of them, they have not.

replies(5): >>42132845 #>>42133639 #>>42135099 #>>42135476 #>>42135564 #
1. 71bw ◴[] No.42135564[source]
1st year college student here, and an alumni of a certain high school programme I'd rather not mention ever again.

I've used LLMs MULTIPLE times during "academic" work, often for original idea generation. Never for full-on, actual writing.

Think of my usage as treating it as a tool that gives you a stem of an idea that you develop further on your own. It helps me persevere with the worst part of work: having to actually come up with an entire idea on my own.

And AI detection tools are still complete garbage as far as I can tell, a paper abstract I've written in front of one of my professors got flagged as 100% AI generated (while having no access to outside sources).