←back to thread

461 points thunderbong | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.222s | source
Show context
davedx ◴[] No.42133938[source]
This seems like a glaring bug in the scripts run by that `npx` command. The author is correct, the scripts should 100%:

- Choose the lowest cost resource (it's a tutorial!)

- Cleanup resources when the `delete` subscript is run

I don't think it's fair to expect developers to do paranoid sweeps of their entire AWS account looking for rogue resources after running something like this.

If a startup had this behavior would you shrug and say "this happens, you just have to be paranoid"? Why is AWS held to a different standard by some?

replies(7): >>42134019 #>>42134079 #>>42134081 #>>42134225 #>>42134243 #>>42134471 #>>42134516 #
1. deskr ◴[] No.42134516[source]
> I don't think it's fair to expect developers to do paranoid sweeps ...

Agree, it isn't fair. I think it's sensible though. When creating anything on AWS I always behave like AWS is an hostile financial institution gone rogue.