←back to thread

243 points Jimmc414 | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.597s | source
Show context
aeternum ◴[] No.42130415[source]
Real reason: The Guardian can't handle when readers community note them using.. The Guardian.

https://twitter.com/MarioNawfal/status/1821189070401249385/p...

replies(10): >>42130445 #>>42130532 #>>42130621 #>>42130659 #>>42130717 #>>42130985 #>>42131005 #>>42131035 #>>42134175 #>>42142921 #
anunes ◴[] No.42130621[source]
Are community notes impartial?
replies(4): >>42130666 #>>42130806 #>>42130873 #>>42130925 #
fwip ◴[] No.42130873[source]
Community notes are not impartial, they are written and approved by the users who sign up to do so (and actually take the time to do this unpaid labor).

Thus, they tend to reflect the biases of the kind of people who most want to (and have time to) write and approve community notes, drawn from the pool of people who use your site.

replies(2): >>42131465 #>>42135694 #
aeternum ◴[] No.42131465[source]
Now do democracy and voting. Or how about serving on a jury. Or serving on a school board.

By your definition those also must not be impartial and maybe that is a fair definition but what does it imply?

Do you similarly distrust democratic outcomes, jury decisions, etc.?

replies(2): >>42133047 #>>42133059 #
1. fwip ◴[] No.42133059[source]
Jurors do not self-select into jury duty, though some try harder than others to get out of it. So the effect is less.

Voters are partial to the candidates they vote for; that's why they vote for them.

replies(1): >>42133636 #
2. mensetmanusman ◴[] No.42133636[source]
I was able to get out of jury duty by saying I tended to agree with police. This was advice given to me by a friend in law enforcement.:.
replies(1): >>42135627 #
3. fwip ◴[] No.42135627[source]
Yes, it's not difficult to get out of. You could also get out by saying that you don't trust the police, or any number of things that might affect your ability to be impartial in the case before you.