←back to thread

Why the Guardian is no longer posting on X

(www.theguardian.com)
243 points Jimmc414 | 1 comments | 13 Nov 24 20:58 UTC | HN request time: 0.374s | source
Show context
aeternum ◴[13 Nov 24 21:49 UTC] No.42130415[source]▶
Real reason: The Guardian can't handle when readers community note them using.. The Guardian.

https://twitter.com/MarioNawfal/status/1821189070401249385/p...

replies(10): >>42130445 #>>42130532 #>>42130621 #>>42130659 #>>42130717 #>>42130985 #>>42131005 #>>42131035 #>>42134175 #>>42142921 #
anunes ◴[13 Nov 24 22:07 UTC] No.42130621[source]▶
Are community notes impartial?
replies(4): >>42130666 #>>42130806 #>>42130873 #>>42130925 #
fwip ◴[13 Nov 24 22:28 UTC] No.42130873[source]▶
Community notes are not impartial, they are written and approved by the users who sign up to do so (and actually take the time to do this unpaid labor).

Thus, they tend to reflect the biases of the kind of people who most want to (and have time to) write and approve community notes, drawn from the pool of people who use your site.

replies(2): >>42131465 #>>42135694 #
aeternum ◴[13 Nov 24 23:41 UTC] No.42131465[source]▶
Now do democracy and voting. Or how about serving on a jury. Or serving on a school board.

By your definition those also must not be impartial and maybe that is a fair definition but what does it imply?

Do you similarly distrust democratic outcomes, jury decisions, etc.?

replies(2): >>42133047 #>>42133059 #
1. wezdog1 ◴[14 Nov 24 03:59 UTC] No.42133047[source]▶
Would you prefer a trial by community notes or by jury.