←back to thread

150 points sohkamyung | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
MostlyStable ◴[] No.42131693[source]
A lot of comments are focusing on the value as a RISC-V development platform, which is obviously important, but I'm also hopeful that this presages more Framework mainboard options besides just what Framework itself offers. There is already a pretty big community offering I/O modules beyond Framework's options, but the true benefit of a Framework system is in the ability to not be locked in to only what one company things is worth the time and effort to develop. This is the first inkling that that benefit might actually come about.
replies(3): >>42132202 #>>42133441 #>>42135140 #
MindSpunk ◴[] No.42132202[source]
There's not really a lot of room for anyone to make a board that isn't a curiosity or highly-specific developer platform though. Framework already have both x86 vendors covered for people who want Intel or AMD. The only other chip worth making a board for is Snapdragon X Elite. There's nothing else in the same performance class.
replies(5): >>42132448 #>>42132528 #>>42132763 #>>42133374 #>>42169840 #
1. beeflet ◴[] No.42132763[source]
> that isn't a curiosity or highly-specific developer platform though

So what? It would be great to use this as a developer platform because you have the whole chassis and peripherals of a laptop and all you have to make is the mainboard